A contrarian view:

I find the use of sub-modules helpful when I want to use separate files to 
maintain part of the module that is logically separate, while 
maintaining/restricting the use of them to a single namespace.

The fact that tools have a problem with trying to compile a sub-module can be 
addressed in the tools themselves.

> On Aug 5, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Indeed
> https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/26
> 
> On 2020-08-05, 5:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Vladimir Vassilev" 
> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>    On 05/08/2020 18.48, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> 
>> I personally meanwhile believe that sub-modules add complexity with
>> little extra value but this view surely is not shared by others.
> 
>    +1. IMO removing sub-modules from YANG 2.0 should be on the list of 
>    proposed changes.
> 
>    /Vladimir
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    netmod mailing list
>    [email protected]
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to