On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:36AM +0000, Qin Wu wrote: > > Wrong. The semantics of the counter types provided by ietf-yang-types are > well defined. > > [Qin]: I agree counter types in ietf-yang-types are well defined. > If counter types can help distinguish avg value from min, max, sum value, > current value, I am > happy to adopt it, however I fail to see ietf-yang-types can do that and I > don't think distinguishing avg from min,max etc > is the job of ietf-yang-types. It add complexity if going with that > direction, in my understanding.
You miss my point: The specification of a leaf needs to be clear what it is. If it is not clear, then the specification is buggy. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
