Good, thanks Jurgen for clarification.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] 
发送时间: 2020年8月30日 18:52
收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]>
抄送: Lou Berger <[email protected]>; Kent Watsen <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:36AM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> 
> Wrong. The semantics of the counter types provided by ietf-yang-types are 
> well defined.
> 
> [Qin]: I agree counter types in ietf-yang-types are well defined. 
> If counter types can help distinguish avg value from min, max, sum 
> value, current value, I am happy to adopt it, however I fail to see 
> ietf-yang-types can do that and I don't think distinguishing avg from min,max 
> etc is the job of ietf-yang-types. It add complexity if going with that 
> direction, in my understanding.

You miss my point: The specification of a leaf needs to be clear what it is. If 
it is not clear, then the specification is buggy.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to