Hi -
On 2021-03-17 4:15 AM, tom petch wrote:
From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Randy Presuhn
<[email protected]>
Sent: 10 March 2021 18:28
On 2021-03-10 12:43 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Dear Qin,
I believe this work repeats failures of the past but since the WG
agreed to entertain this, I will keep my mouth shut. I suggest you do
not spend your energy to convince the that this work is viable since
it is rather unlikely that I will change my mind.
<tp>
Meanwhile the ITU-T has just liaised the IETF that it is starting work on
intent-based management. I have not looked to see if the same words mean the
same thing but guess that they do.
:-) A risky guess, based on my experience. I vividly remember an
X3T5.4 meeting in which we *thought* we were wrapping things up, until
someone (me) foolishly drew an E-R diagram on the whiteboard,
causing us to realize that although we thought we had reached
agreement, we had in fact been using the same words strung together
in the same order to talk about radically different models.
Randy
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
