Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. Section 1. , paragraph 2, nit: > s both applied configuration data as well as status and statistics. As a resu > ^^^^^^^^^^ Probable usage error. Use "and" after "both". Section 6. , paragraph 2, nit: > ormat): HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2019 20:56:30 GMT Server: example-s > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The date 26 Jan 2019 is not a Thursday, but a Saturday. Uncited references: [RFC6991]. These URLs point to tools.ietf.org, which is being deprecated: * http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/ These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS: * http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/ _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
