On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:52 PM Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel= [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I propose we send the following statement to ORAN as an answer to their > liaison statement available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1785/ > I support this action. IMO these 2 drafts are the most useful and also the closest to being ready for publication. There is no reason to hold them back when they get completed before the other 3. Andy --------------------------------------- > > From Group: IETF / netmod > > From Contacts: Jürgen Schönwälder [email protected], > Thomas Nadeau [email protected] Lou Berger <[email protected]> > > Joel Jaeggli [email protected] Kent Watsen <[email protected]> > > > > To Group: O-RAN-WG10 > > To Contact: Jiajin Gao, [email protected] > > Purpose: Information > > > > The IETF netmod WG will progress the > > - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning > > - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver > > independently from the draft-ietf-netmod-yang-packages, > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-ver-selection and > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-schema-comparison. > > > > The final, approved RFC version of the first two drafts can be estimated > to be ready 2022-Q2 to 2023 Q1. > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Regards Balazs > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
