> On Apr 13, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I agree. If we end up with "yang-next" as I've heard it called, this would >> be a useful case to resolve. >> >> If we ended up with such a thing, it'd be nice to simply deprecate the >> "unknown" leaves, upgrade the type from "bits" to "bits-with-unknown" (or >> similar) and work from there. >> > > Hi Jeff, > > Can you add to this issue? > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/90 > <https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/90>
Done. - Jeff
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
