Jason,

> On Apr 13, 2023, at 5:25 PM, Jason Sterne (Nokia) <jason.ste...@nokia.com> 
> wrote:
> In the Schema Comparison draft we’re also debating whether to add “per node” 
> compatibility tags (optional – use when needed, and this is a case where it 
> is useful to flag a particular *node* as having an NBC change in version 
> 2.0.0).

I've not read the draft, but this seems to be a Good Thing.  Basically 
"impacted by revX" with a per-rev statement describing that impact.

One thought for accommodating NBC for types such as the unknown-bits one is 
that each instantiation of it in a model simply does its own typedef of that 
typedef.  It thus, as a base, inherits the underlying unknown-bits types, but 
provides a point of maintenance for individual values.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to