Bo and Jan (CC-ed), Please reply-all to this email with your response to the original IPR call here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xHDWFr5e2ykRBEseq-99PhRENGM/
Jason, thank you for highlighting this issue to the chairs. Kent // as chair > On Apr 24, 2023, at 5:48 PM, Jason Sterne (Nokia) <jason.ste...@nokia.com> > wrote: > > Hello chairs and WG, > > (as an author) > > We've updated both drafts to refactor Acknowledgements vs Contributors: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/09/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/11/ > > The IPR call for Module Versioning is complete. It already included all > authors + contributors. > > For YANG Semver, we're missing IPR declarations from the following people (we > didn't include them in the original IPR call): > Bo Wu > lana.w...@huawei.com > > Jan Lindblad > jlind...@cisco.com > > Rgds, > Jason > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen >> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 7:35 PM >> To: netmod@ietf.org >> Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09 >> >> >> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking >> links or >> opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. >> >> >> >> Authors/All, >> >> One of the authors pointed out that the list of contributors was incomplete, >> and >> specifically didn't include all listed in the paragraph of the contributors >> section. >> We had mistakenly read this paragraph as Acknowledgments versus >> Contributors. It does appear that some of those listed may be Contributors, >> i.e., >> materially contributed to the technical solution or the text (excluding >> editorial >> changes), while others may in fact belong in an Acknowledgement section. >> Given this, we'd like to ask the authors to refactor the Contributors >> section into >> separate Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward on >> this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if there are >> any missing IPR statements. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Kent and Lou >> >> >>> On Jan 16, 2023, at 5:59 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: >>> >>> [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the >> authors and contributors listed in the draft] >>> >>> >>> Authors, Contributors, WG, >>> >>> In preparation for a WGLC Call: >>> >>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? >>> >>> Please state either: >>> >>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >>> or >>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >>> >>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? >>> >>> If yes to the above, please state either: >>> >>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >>> or >>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >>> >>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >>> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor >>> please answer the above by responding to this email regardless >>> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This >>> document will not advance to the next stage until a response >>> has been received from each author. >>> >>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not >>> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations >>> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF >>> if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to >>> refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related >>> to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs >>> listed above and >>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Kent and Lou >>> >>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >>> response. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod