I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. /Jan Lindblad
On 25 Apr 2023, at 00:04, Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Bo and Jan (CC-ed), Please reply-all to this email with your response to the original IPR call here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xHDWFr5e2ykRBEseq-99PhRENGM/ Jason, thank you for highlighting this issue to the chairs. Kent // as chair On Apr 24, 2023, at 5:48 PM, Jason Sterne (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello chairs and WG, (as an author) We've updated both drafts to refactor Acknowledgements vs Contributors: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/09/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/11/ The IPR call for Module Versioning is complete. It already included all authors + contributors. For YANG Semver, we're missing IPR declarations from the following people (we didn't include them in the original IPR call): Bo Wu [email protected] Jan Lindblad [email protected] Rgds, Jason -----Original Message----- From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 7:35 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. Authors/All, One of the authors pointed out that the list of contributors was incomplete, and specifically didn't include all listed in the paragraph of the contributors section. We had mistakenly read this paragraph as Acknowledgments versus Contributors. It does appear that some of those listed may be Contributors, i.e., materially contributed to the technical solution or the text (excluding editorial changes), while others may in fact belong in an Acknowledgement section. Given this, we'd like to ask the authors to refactor the Contributors section into separate Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward on this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if there are any missing IPR statements. Thank you, Kent and Lou On Jan 16, 2023, at 5:59 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the authors and contributors listed in the draft] Authors, Contributors, WG, In preparation for a WGLC Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Kent and Lou PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
