Tom, you’re arguing our case. The requirements specifically state that modules do and need to be updated sometimes in NBC ways. The idea of this work is not to make perfection the enemy of good.
Joe From: tom petch <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 08:01 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, Benoit Claise <[email protected]>, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08.txt From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: 27 June 2023 14:19 Yes, I had pushed for this. I think it would have help better frame this work given how long it is taking. <tp> Yes but had the then I-D been put forward as WGLC, I would have opposed it. I think that the I-D overstates the case. Modules have been and do get updated and the idea of having perfection on day is like a frictionless surface, a useful theoretical concept but not one any engineer expects to create. Tom Petch Joe From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Benoit Claise <[email protected]> Date: Monday, June 26, 2023 at 12:21 To: tom petch <[email protected]>, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08.txt Dear all, I am generically not in favor of publishing requirement documents. However, it might have proven beneficial in this particular case. Regards, Benoit On 6/26/2023 6:02 PM, tom petch wrote: > From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <[email protected]> > Sent: 26 June 2023 16:53 > > This revision is a resurrection of the expired I-D to help frame the LC > discussions around module versioning and YANG Semver. > > <tp> > Joe > > Thank you for that > > Tom Petch > > > Joe > > From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] > <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, June 26, 2023 at 11:49 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Network Modeling > (NETMOD) WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Module Versioning Requirements > Author : Joe Clarke > Filename : draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2023-06-26 > > Abstract: > This document describes the problems that can arise because of the > YANG language module update rules, that require all updates to YANG > module preserve strict backwards compatibility. It also defines the > requirements on any solution designed to solve the stated problems. > This document does not consider possible solutions, nor endorse any > particular solution. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
