From: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> Sent: 25 September 2023 13:10
We are not discussing any examples here. <tp> Good I am suggesting an addition to RFC8407 s.4.2 to prevent future confusion Tom Petch /js On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:09:07PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > > I wonder if we should have a prefix to show that the prefix is an example. > > Thus some vendors might think that > prefix vendor-alto-ds > is the prefix that must be used in vendor modules that support discovery > based on the examples in draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang > > Perhaps a prefix such as > eg-... > would be better although I would rather it were three or four characters. > > Tom Petch > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
