RFC 8407 says:
o The local module prefix MAY be used for references to typedefs,
groupings, extensions, features, and identities defined in the
module.
Do you propose to change this and if so to what?
/js
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:14:54PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
> From: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]>
> Sent: 25 September 2023 13:10
>
> We are not discussing any examples here.
>
> <tp>
>
> Good
>
> I am suggesting an addition to RFC8407 s.4.2 to prevent future confusion
>
> Tom Petch
>
> /js
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:09:07PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if we should have a prefix to show that the prefix is an example.
> >
> > Thus some vendors might think that
> > prefix vendor-alto-ds
> > is the prefix that must be used in vendor modules that support discovery
> > based on the examples in draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang
> >
> > Perhaps a prefix such as
> > eg-...
> > would be better although I would rather it were three or four characters.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> --
> Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/>
--
Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
