[email protected] wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Martin Björklund <[email protected]> > > Envoyé : jeudi 14 décembre 2023 21:48 > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]> > > Cc : [email protected] > > Objet : Re: [netmod] case + when in 8407bis > > > > Hi, > > > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi Martin, all, > > > > > > Please remember that RFC8407 includes already the following: > > > > > > == > > > "when" statement evaluation is generally more expensive than > > > "if-feature" or "choice" statements == > > > > Yes, this is fine. It is something that the module designer can > > keep in mind when designing the module (actually, the text says > > "MAY be considered"). > > > > [Med] ACK for the MAY part. However, that excerpt seems to implicitly > assume that either a "when" is present or "choice". At least this is > how I interpret that text. No?
I don't think it should be interpreted that way. It basically says that *if* a model can be designed with "if-feature" or "choice" instead of (an expensive) "when", then it should be considered. It doesn't say anything about the combination of "when" and "choice". /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
