Hi, all, As a co-author, I support the adoption of this work. It is separated from another WG item in OPSAWG because of its wide applicability.
The groupings defined in this draft now has a couple of consumers, the authors believe different work related to scheduling contexts can benefit from such a common basic definition. Best Regards, Qiufang -----Original Message----- From: netmod <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 11:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [netmod] Adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang-04 NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: A Common YANG Data Model for Scheduling https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang PS: This draft moved from OPSAWG to NETMOD There is no known IPR on this draft: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/mg1KP3m6bCSXh-3N-YKLvEb_udk/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day Apr 10 (any time zone). Thank you, Kent (as co-chair) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
