I support adoption of this work. It forms the foundation of work in other WGs, and I’m happy to have this worked by netmod if there is sufficient interest.
As an opsawg co-chair, I’m copying opsawg to get their opinions. This work has been presented there and is a dependency of an ACL draft currently adopted by opsawg. Joe From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 11:50 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [netmod] Adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang-04 NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: A Common YANG Data Model for Scheduling https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang PS: This draft moved from OPSAWG to NETMOD There is no known IPR on this draft: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/mg1KP3m6bCSXh-3N-YKLvEb_udk/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day Apr 10 (any time zone). Thank you, Kent (as co-chair) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
