Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-32: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work done in this document, I have nevertheless some non-blocking comments (see below) and I am also curious why this document was done in NETMOD rather than OPSAWG (as it seems that many YANG models are authored in OPSAWG even if NETMOD charter would allow it). # Meta data Should Mahesh's new affiliation be specified ? # Abstract and title It is unclear that the YANG model is only for the collector part of syslog. # Section 1 What is the `target system` ? At first reading, it seems to be the collector system, if so, should the I-D be consistent in vocabulary ? # Section 5.1 While I am not a YANG expert, isn't it weird to replicate the facility-filter under console, remote, and file ? Or is it just a caveat of the tree diagram when it expands the facility-filter grouping several times ? Would it be possible to import TLS and authentication from other YANG models ? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
