Let me clarify, I’m trying to close the "default 0” statement on the "local-port” leafs issue. Whether rfc8407bis is updated is a secondary concern.
Andy (and others), do you believe this (to never set “default” or “mandatory”) to be a best-practice for reusable groupings? Or more specifically and better for me, do you think the "default 0” statement on the "local-port” leafs is okay or should be removed (in the tcl-client-server draft)? Kent > On Sep 20, 2024, at 11:14 AM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I do not think any new YANG guidelines need to be added to the already > completed rfc8407bis. > This is a design decision based on the intended reuse of the groupings. > > Here is a common sense guideline: Document the grouping reuse limitations > in the description-stmt. > > > Andy > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 8:02 AM Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Can folks please chime in on this discussion to help bring it to a close? >> >> I rescinded my AUTH48 “approval” for the tcp-client-server draft pending >> the outcome of this discussion. >> >> PS: I see that Thomas CC-ed NETMOD, which makes sense given a potential >> update to rfc8407bis. >> >> Kent >> >> >> On Sep 18, 2024, at 2:52 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Dear Kent, Andy and Alex, >> >> I think Alex statement >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5Yaiom0B0lDTeSPOvgNfPIEFvBw/, >> Andy's feedback and guidelines in >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8407#section-4.4 resp. >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-15#section-4.4 >> makes perfectly sense and I don't see why we should do else. As an >> author, I suggest to add in section 4 of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis based >> on the conclusion of this discussion guidelines on reusable YANG groupings. >> >> Best wishes >> Thomas >> >> *From:* Kent Watsen <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2024 3:12 AM >> *To:* Andy Bierman <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> *Subject:* [netconf] Re: Default statements on udp-client-server groupings >> >> *Be aware:* This is an external email. >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> >> The main purpose for YANG defaults is ease of use. >> If there are less things to configure then the device is easier to use. >> Without a default port then this parameter becomes mandatory to configure _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
