Hi Andy, > This seems like a good idea for authors of I-Ds. > Are you suggesting that non-authors would be required to maintain and use a > specific toolchain simply to read an Internet Draft? > Because there is no Internet Draft to read anymore?
Sorry for any confusion. The idea is that Datatracker would then itself consume the built I-D, such that all existing behavior is maintained. The only difference being that "TGZ" would be offered as a new optional document format, if available. In case it's unclear, this idea hopes to: simplify Shepherd/AD/IESG/Editor effort in trying to validate examples enable better reconstruction of the original development environment (for -biz efforts) tip-toe into the VELOCE effort Dovetailing with Rob's comment, the examples used for coverage statistics do NOT have to be in the I-D itself, in case having such potentially long examples may distract from the value of the example in the I-D. Personally, if not including the whole example, I'd likely use some combination of `head` and `tail` to cherry-pick the meaningful part from a fully-validated example. Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
