+1, I think the main difference with 7950 is Outdate reference update, one reference is still outdated which is RFC8407, I think it should be updated as RFC9907 now.
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2026年5月6日 21:24 收件人: NetMod WG <[email protected]> 主题: [netmod] Re: WG adoption call: draft-yn-netmod-yang2-02 Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think we need or should delay the adoption poll for > draft-yn-netmod-yang2-02 (the subject of this thread), but instead this > could probably happen in parallel. Agreed.... I think that a regular pattern of design-team/virtual-interim meetings are needed to get a group through Rob's issue document. I would discourage use of side meetings to do this. One of the categories for the issues should be: bring up at plenary week meeting. Particularly since this document is just 7950 reformatted as -00. (If I were chair, I would have just adopted it by chair fiat power, since it contains no text that wasn't previously published) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide ** My working hours and your working hours may be different. ** ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours ** _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
