Support adoption of this draft as baseline, but I am a little bit surprised 
that the proposed changes to draft-yn-netmod-yang2 presented in IETF 125 (i..e, 
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://netmod-wg.github.io/yang2/main/draft-yn-netmod-yang2-02.txt&url_2=https://netmod-wg.github.io/yang2/make-baseline/draft-yn-netmod-yang2-03.txt)
hasn’t been incorporated in.

Also I am wondering whether all existing RFCs with RFC7950 update should choose 
to factor out YANG specific part and fold into this YANG 2.0?

-Qin
发件人: Lou Berger [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2026年4月28日 5:43
收件人: NetMod WG <[email protected]>
抄送: NetMod WG Chairs <[email protected]>
主题: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-yn-netmod-yang2-02


Hello,



This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yn-netmod-yang2/



Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the

list by the end of the day (any time zone) May 11.



Thank you,

Lou (as Co-chair)






_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to