Hi Kent,
yes, obviously, something around those lines.
Thanks and regards, Benoit
On 11/05/2026 16:52, Kent Watsen wrote:
Hi Benoit,
Would adding the following as a 2nd paragraph to the Introduction work?
The XML encoding for YANG modeled data was originally defined in
[RFC7950].
The IETF consensus is to move the normative definition out of RFC
7950. This
document, modeled after [RFC7951], achieves that goal.
Kent
On May 11, 2026, at 2:58 AM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
I believe this draft misses a basic section/justification on why we
need this work, and how this document fits with the other
specifications and how it's aligned with the other encoding spec.
Regards, Benoit
On 27/04/2026 23:46, Lou Berger wrote:
Hello,
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yn-netmod-yang-xml/
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
list by the end of the day (any time zone) May 11.
Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
