Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 3, para 2: I think what the authors call 'non-linear development' of Yang modules, is what I would refer to a fork in code/s/w development. It doesn't often go well for s/w development, but maybe Yang modules are different. I certainly don't know enough about how Yang modules are actually used to tell. Section 8.2: draft-ietf-tls-8446bis is in AUTH48, it might make sense to use that vice RFC8446. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
