Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to the authors and the WG for this important work to handle this very fundamental challenge in maintenance of YANG modules. Since this has been already pointed out by some other ADs, I will avoid repeating, but would appreciate if the referenced documents that are published as RFCs are updated. Most importantly, please fix the following: 1.2. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Note to the RFC Editor: This section is to be removed prior to publication. This document updates [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]. The header metadata for this document should be updated to the new RFC number when [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis] is published. I hope this is all taken care of before the IESG approves this document. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
