Thank you Charles.
Regarding your question below support in YANG validators, I'm punting to Joe
and Michal.
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 07:47:28 PM EDT, Charles Eckel via Datatracker
<[email protected]> wrote:
Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great to see this work finally making it to the finish line.
My understanding is that support been added to YANG validators (e.g., YANG
Catalog, pyang, yanglint) to support the "rev:non-backwards-compatible"
extension statement. Is that correct? I ask because I believe it is important
that support exists, but in regard to implementation status, the shepherds
writeup says, "This is YANG Module. Implementation status is unknown."
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
