Hello Dan Thanks for the proposed issues.
> - better model for learning what extensions are supported by the currently > running plugin. I agree with this point and would contribute for the better model. As you know, we talked about our Qutantum plugin in the previous OpenStack Conference. Now, the plugin is publicly available. So it would be nice to share our experiences in next summit, which will be feasible to the topic. In the slot, I would discuss other plugin models to have better model. How do you think of that? Hiroshi > -----Original Message----- > From: netstack-bounces+dem=ah.jp.nec....@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:netstack-bounces+dem=ah.jp.nec....@lists.launchpad.net] On > Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:11 AM > To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans > > Hi team, > > As we start to look forward to Folsom, I know there will be a lot of excitement > around shiny new directions we can take Quantum (L3, VPN/DCI, etc.). This > is great, and we will be moving in this direction during Folsom. I know many > people are looking to participate here. > > But I also want to stress the importance of also focusing on less shiny tasks > that are central to building a solid and usable platform. To this end, I wanted > to highlight a link I sent out during last weeks meeting: > http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumStarterBugs > > This page has a pointer to low-hanging fruit bugs as well as a list of > "community projects" that are not necessarily shiny, but are critical to the > progress of the project. This includes things like improving the CLI, > integrating with Horizon/Keystone, building a system test infrastructure, > updating documentation, multi-host devstack, etc. > > In many cases, these are items that we targeted for Essex, but didn't have > sufficient core dev resources to tackle. With Quantum becoming core in > Folsom, we can't afford to have that happen again, as expectations around > Quantums usability, robustness and integration with other projects will be > much higher in Folsom than it was for Essex. > > I encourage others to add items to this page as well. My general rule is that > something is a community project if its unlikely that someone is doing the > work to enable something for their platform/company. As a hint, if a bunch > of people who express interesting in working on something, its probably not a > community project. If people have been saying "hey, someone should really > fix/improve X" for a while, the fix would help just about everyone, but no one > has yet stepped forward, its probably a community project :) > > > So in sum, as an open source project, we must make sure everyone is > encouraged and rewarded for working on core community projects. I also > want to make sure sufficient time at the summit is dedicated to how we will > progress on both community projects. > > Since we will soon be able to register sessions for the Folsom summits, I'd like > people to chime in on the list for what they think are the most important > "community projects", as well as "shiny objects" for us to discuss at the > summit. Hopefully this will make the process of designing sessions more > collaborative and community-driver, rather than a game of "I better try and > register the session on X before someone else does". > > Here are some initial thoughts: > > community projects: > - improve system test / devstack / tempest > - quantum authn + authz (yes, we still do not have basic API auth) > - better integration with openstack CI team (we want automated smoketests > to run on each check-in) > - quantum CLI / client improvements. (many changes needed to be more > inline with other core projects) > - reworking of quantum / nova integration (remove dependence on nova db, > etc.) > - better model for learning what extensions are supported by the currently > running plugin. > - quantum + horizon GUI flow (and framework for widgets that use API > extensions). > - melange / quantum integration > - DHCP API / service > > shiny objects: > - L3 API > - VPN / data-center-interconnect > - firewalling / security groups. > > Please reply with your own input. Thanks, > > Dan > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
