I'm trying to sum up the whole discussion. The main trigger is an article about Silvio Berlusconi (Italy's prime minister) in which is stated that Berlusconi wants to discuss some "internet rules" during the upcoming G8.Then Matteo wrote on the list something that sounded like "some kind of ruling over the internet is a good thing against crimes", while he intended "Authorities should be able to punish the ones who perpetrate an international crime over the internet". This misunderstanding almost started a flame ;) However, the discussion moved on: should netsukuku implement some feature to prevent excessive spreading of criminal-related web pages? EG: Pedopornography.
My proposal was to implement a rating system: every domain should have something like a "tag" voted by the users that visited it. Once you have enought reviews and/or an hight percentage of "comments per visit", you can choose what to do with that domain. First thing that camed at my mind is: if my neighbourhood is tagged as "criminal", I MIGHT want to refuse routing the traffic directed to him, in order to isolate that domain (althought this may be a bad idea). At the end, we are discussing if we should implement something like "suggestions" and "warnings" about domains, using voted tags or other means, but we come up that "shaping of traffic" is bad, since it might become really easy to tag and isulate some nodes, so that some people cannot expose their ideas (and this is exactly the opposite of the idea behind netsukuku: everyone should be able to speak) 08/12/5 Ricardo Lanziano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It would be nice to keep the list in English (or at least a translation) > since > many of us don't speak Italian.
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
