On 09:21 Fri 25 Mar , Elifarley Callado Coelho Cruz wrote: > As I understand, Vala doesn't seem to have any downsides that are strong > enough that would make C a better choice. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Vala kind of provide the best parts of > C (it can be compiled to C, which in turn can be compiled to optimized > machine code) and the best parts of Python (expressive language, lets you > focus on your problem domain rather than on the language itself) > > In other words, I think Vala looks like a very good choice, or at least > better than C. > > If Vala has some serious drawbacks, making C or other language a better > choice, please point them out. > > Thanks, > Elifarley
AFAIK Vala software is glib2 dependent which is not good. Also code generated by Vala compiler isn't quite human readable and can't be easily optimized if necessary. I think Vala is not a good choice in this case. _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
