Yeah, Exactly, Plus, Pretty much all of the other meshnets have scalability
problems too.
________________________________
From: Michael Grube <[email protected]>
To: Netsukuku discussion list <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:37:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Netsukuku] cjdns in comparison.
Go go gadget google!
http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/doc/main_doc/topology.pdf
So unless CJDNS's topology is _exactly_ the same as Netsukuku, I'd say pick
whichever one you want. I know that you'd probably be much more appreciated
here :)
There is no superior case and the truth is really that pretty much nobody
really has the answers. One project is not superior to the others and nobody is
going to become Linus mfing Torvalds from the work they do here. Understand
both systems and work toward whichever you are more curious about.
Religious wars are started and maintained by trolls. Act accordingly.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Yussi <[email protected]> wrote:
This guy is starting to convince me that to all intents and purposes ntk
>and cjdns are the same thing, and ntk has not major advantages over cjdns
>
>http://www.reddit.com/r/darknetplan/comments/1emjof/new_netsukuku_subreddit/ca1suwk
>
>Is he right? can anyone find a silver bullet that will give a reason not
>to just drop ntk and go with cjdns?
>_______________________________________________
>Netsukuku mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
>
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
