I'm not sure GNUnet is meant for the hardware level. In my mind, GNUnet might ideally run on top of Netsukuku.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jaromil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2013, Michael Grube wrote: > > > > > Go go gadget google! > > [1]http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/doc/main_doc/topology.pdf > > So unless CJDNS's topology is _exactly_ the same as Netsukuku, I'd say > > pick whichever one you want. I know that you'd probably be much more > > appreciated here :) > > There is no superior case and the truth is really that pretty much > > nobody really has the answers. One project is not superior to the > > others and nobody is going to become Linus mfing Torvalds from the > work > > they do here. Understand both systems and work toward whichever you > are > > more curious about. > > Religious wars are started and maintained by trolls. Act accordingly. > > ahahah!! standing OV! > > btw anyone here has looked into GNUnet? > > because THAT seems VERY convincing to me, at least on paper. > > but then again, it is a different design. > > ciao > _______________________________________________ > Netsukuku mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku >
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
