Whoops, those links are broken. Still, a google search for each of those PDF names will give you the original documentation. You should seriously read it before you write some attention grabbing article saying a design is completely invalid.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Michael Grube <[email protected]>wrote: > > http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/index.php?pag=documentation&dir=/main_documentation > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Grube <[email protected]>wrote: > >> What do I...think of it? >> >> RTFM, GTFO >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't know if it was me or him, but certainly somebody has >>> missunderstood >>> Netsukuku... and in that article he only talks about the routing >>> protocol, as if >>> that was the whole netsukuku thing, and again, one of us two has >>> missunderstood >>> QSPN... >>> >>> -- >>> gdrooid >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:19:13PM +0200, Ilario Gelmetti wrote: >>> > Hi all! >>> > What do you think about this article? >>> > >>> > "Netsukuku unsuitable for wireless networks" >>> > https://we.riseup.net/mbxxii/netsukuk-unsuitable-for-wireless-networks >>> > >>> > Bye, >>> > Ilario Gelmetti >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Netsukuku mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
