My apologies for flaming. It's frustrating to see a claim like this based off of a wiki article they read.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Michael Grube <[email protected]>wrote: > Whoops, those links are broken. Still, a google search for each of those > PDF names will give you the original documentation. You should seriously > read it before you write some attention grabbing article saying a design is > completely invalid. > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Michael Grube <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/index.php?pag=documentation&dir=/main_documentation >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Grube <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> What do I...think of it? >>> >>> RTFM, GTFO >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know if it was me or him, but certainly somebody has >>>> missunderstood >>>> Netsukuku... and in that article he only talks about the routing >>>> protocol, as if >>>> that was the whole netsukuku thing, and again, one of us two has >>>> missunderstood >>>> QSPN... >>>> >>>> -- >>>> gdrooid >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:19:13PM +0200, Ilario Gelmetti wrote: >>>> > Hi all! >>>> > What do you think about this article? >>>> > >>>> > "Netsukuku unsuitable for wireless networks" >>>> > >>>> https://we.riseup.net/mbxxii/netsukuk-unsuitable-for-wireless-networks >>>> > >>>> > Bye, >>>> > Ilario Gelmetti >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Netsukuku mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
