In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John-Mark Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Given the above, I propose the following:
>
> 1) Formalise GPL version 2 as being the GPL version which NetSurf is
> licensed under. This may be found at
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
>
> 2) Come to an agreement about whether to permit the user to relicense
> the software under future GPL versions. For reference, GPL version 3
> has been recently released. This may be found at
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
>
> 3) Include a specific exemption to permit linking against OpenSSL.
> [...]
> On proposals 1, 2, and 3, I require replies from the following people, who
> have contributed code to NetSurf:
>
> [...]
> John Tytgat
> [...]
No objections for proposals 1 and 2. Concerning proposal 3, the exemption
clause would be nice and if there is no concensus for that, then I'm fine
with it too (which means OpenSSL needs to be hacked out of NetSurf ?).
John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home BASS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARM powered, RISC OS driven
