On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, John Tytgat wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John-Mark Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:2) Come to an agreement about whether to permit the user to relicense the software under future GPL versions. For reference, GPL version 3 has been recently released. This may be found at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.htmlNo objections for proposals 1 and 2.
Thanks. WRT proposal 2, could you clarify your position, please? (See my earlier reply to Kevin Bagust about this -- there's also a 5th option in addition to the 4 I outlined there -- "I don't mind either way"). That it needs clarification at all is my fault; the proposal was badly worded ;)
Concerning proposal 3, the exemption clause would be nice and if there is no concensus for that, then I'm fine with it too (which means OpenSSL needs to be hacked out of NetSurf ?).
Yes; that would be necessary should there be no concensus for an exemption clause.
Cheers, John.
