In article <1254248739.23233.15.ca...@duiker>, John-Mark Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In any case, a bug report with sufficient details never > > does any harm and can often do some good. :) > In this particular case, there is little point in > reporting it on the bug tracker. We already know what the > problem is, even if the fix is decidedly non-trivial. > More tickets on the tracker just adds to our workload > when triaging them. > If, however, you encounter NetSurf warning about a lack > of memory when it's using very little (i.e. its main > dynamic area is smaller than 128MB), then we do want such > reports please. NetSurf is not complaining, but should it have five separate Dynamic Areas at once? 424K, 420K, 448K and 13 536K and with no window opening? Opening a window <www.xe.com> actually removes one of the dynamic areas of 4xxK, and once the page is fully loaded a second Dynamic area disappears. No changes to the sizes. Closing the window does not release any memory. This is r8240 though (used because of the memory leaking problems with later versions). -- Russell Hafter - Mailing Lists [email protected] Need a hotel? <http://www.hrs.com/?client=en__blue&customerId=416873103> (NB This link needs Firefox to work)
