On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:51:16 +0100 Richard Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Most tasks are not handling data structures anywhere near as > > complex as NetSurf is. The only other that springs to mind is > > Firefox, and I think we'll all agree that NetSurf is far more > > frugal. > > Firefox isn't really viable on a RiscPC, but NetSurf didn't have this > problem until around August last year. The 21st July version (r8643) > is better behaved as regards memory utilisation. Well, you know where the source is. I've just written a longish mail about what the problems are, and possible solutions to them, on the developer's mailing list. B.
