On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:12:28 +0100 "David J. Ruck" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 47MB isn't an unreasonable amount of memory for a browser to use. > It's less than 2.5% of the minimum any sensible system will have, and > not worth the developers of any modern application trying to optimise > away. Memory is cheap, developer's time isn't. Just to be clear, there are still a handful of memory leak bugs in NetSurf, but 2.5 still greatly reduces its memory usage. (And we do know what causes the one that Russell has experienced, but we're still not completely clear on how to fix it yet.) B.
