Geoff Potter wrote on 3 Mar: > Daniel Silverstone wrote: > ________________________________ > From: Daniel Silverstone <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, 3 March, 2011 11:13:15 > Subject: Mailing list attachment policy
> Hi, > I am the person who *owns* the computer the list runs on, so I think I get to > set the policy. > Here are some simple rules: > 1. If you're not *certain* the attachment will be welcomed; don't put it in. > 2. If someone attaches something, you do *NOT* have the right to lay > into them > about it. > 3. If your complaints generate more wasted bandwidth than the > attachment did, I > reserve the right to ban you from the list. > ________________________________ > End of quoted text... > Hear hear. A sensible approach. (I nearly top-posted this, but didn't want to > start another argument...) > Geoff Potter well, if you see what i mean, there was no need to quote it all back again. we read it the first time. and now the third time. in short: me too. ;=} -- Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
