In article <mpro.nm8dx001qojsl00l7.pit...@pittdj.co.uk>,
David Pitt <pit...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> Hmm! My Iyonix did over three time better than that, and there was
> no "too slow" message. My test piece was http://www.dailymail.co.uk
> because that is a particularly heavy duty site.
OK. A lot of random browsing around that site led to:
(5743.130000) content/llcache.c llcache_finalise 3352: Backing store
average bandwidth 531777 bytes/second
which is over 5 times faster. However, I thought we would be talking
drive speed, which shouldn't be affected by the download speed of any
particular site, or am I completely up the wrong alley?
--
Chris Johnson
