Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:49:15 -0700
From: John Oram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:

Sam:

Yes, Uncle Dave does have a "significant" number of, like you, 
registered users for his various applications.

My point was that EVERY registered user should benefit equally from
Uncle Dave's product enhancements. Unless you paid - hard cash money -
for Uncle Dave to build you a "one off" version. Re-reading your email
below, it seems to me that you indicate your in the same class as 
other "registered" users of Uncle Dave's various applications. Not an
OEM user of a specialty version application which Uncle Dave has built
for volume purchase clients.

John Oram

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I am replying herewith to a recent message I received from John Oram,
> and I am including a CC to all recipients of same.
> 
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:26:36 -0700, John Oram wrote:
> 
> > Sam:
> 
> > Congratulation on getting a fix for your difficulty.
> 
> > Please ask Uncle Dave if he will upgrade the present release to include
> > the re-coding he did for you.
> 
> > Uncle Dave seems to have a habit of being rather discriminatory to not
> > apply new ideas in a manner so we can all benefit at the same time...
> 
> > John Oram
> 
> John:
> 
> I do not know if Uncle Dave provided me with an all-purpose panacea
> or whether it is a fix for dealing with only certain peculiarities
> of "shentel.net".  The same medicine that works for me might not work
> for other people with similar symptoms and complaints.
> 
> Almost all businessmen confer special treatment to serious
> cash-paying customers.  We cannot expect Uncle Dave to be any
> different in this regard.  If it is indeed true that Uncle Dave is in
> fact "discriminatory" along these lines, then I could present some
> perfectly understandable reasons why he might be inclined to be that
> way.   When Uncle Dave fixed Nettamer for me I was already a registered
> paying customer.  I had been using my registered "off-the-shelf"
> version with my former ISP.  It worked fine with "rma.edu".  When I
> switched to subscribing to "shentel.net", then I had a problem with
> Nettamer.  Uncle Dave provided a special patched version for me.  When
> I tried out an "off-the-shelf" version of NetMail Pro I experienced
> problems that were similar to the ones I had with my "off-the-shelf"
> version of Nettamer.
> 
> I wrote to Uncle Dave and promised to register NetMail Pro if he would
> fix it for me.  He did fix it and I wrote back and thanked him and said
> I would register it as soon as the eagle flies again on the 1st of next
> month.  Perhaps the patched version will work only on just a few ISPs
> having the same peculiarities as "shentel.net".  BTW, "shentel.net"
> works fine with almost all the other DOS internet applications I have
> tried out and also those which I currently use.  I have not yet tried
> the patched versions of Nettamer or NetMail Pro with any ISP other than
> "shentel.net".
> 
> When I register my patched version of NetMail Pro next month I will ask
> Uncle Dave about the advisability of providing the patched version on
> his site as a download option.  I will let you guys know what he says.
> 
> Regards to all,
> 
> Sam Heywood



********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the single word
                     Unsubscribe
as the subject.
You MUST use the same address with which you subscribed!
********************************************************

Reply via email to