Rupture or rapture: limited nuclear war is an oxymoron, no matter who believes 
it to be meaningful. 

> On Aug 14, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Morlock Elloi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Urban populations ... no one will waste nukes on peasants. Peasants and the 
> ruling class will survive.
> 
> Do a search on "luxury shelters" or "doomsday bunkers" - from $1MM to $40MM a 
> pop. It doesn't matter if they will work or not - what matters is that the 
> buyers believe they will, and these buyers are the ones making the nuking 
> decisions.
> 
> Between the Silicon Valley psychopaths working on personal immortality, 5 
> megacorps amassing trillions in cash and not spending it, and the top 0.001% 
> becoming preppers, it's obvious that there is a general belief among the 
> ruling class that these tumultuous times will end in some kind of rupture, 
> and they are getting ready. No one likes the times we live in. I don't have 
> any doubts that those of them loosely identifying as "Americans" will opt for 
> the nuclear gamble if faced with losing the imperial status. They are 
> certainly ready to play the nuclear gamble for far less - like losing the 
> elections.
> 
>> On 8/13/17, 19:44, Thomas Keenan wrote:
>> "A limited nuclear war" ... limited to whom?
> 
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to