On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, Vincent Gaulin wrote:

A technical point that I think needs to made is that monetary creation
> involves both the US Congress, Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank. So
> anti-austerity or what in Keynseian terms would be call "counter-cyclical"
> response to crisis is not a question of central banking primarily, but of
> politics more broadly.
>

Vincent, I agree with this and everything else you say in this post. The
current conditions are already forcing a move away from neoliberal
orthodoxy fixated on price stability, ie no inflation. That orthodoxy is
obsolete: there's no inflation anywhere, because wages are so repressed and
the power of labor is so curtailed that you can't have "too much money
chasing too few goods" (the definition of inflation). The corporate
productive order has been unleashed, there's a plethora of goods, but no
one has the wages to buy them. The only place where there's too much money
is at the top, where it chases arbitrarily valued immaterial assets (stock
market boom). Gargantuan efforts are made to prop this system up (Jerome
Powell's Fed has done that over the past six months, both nationally and
internationally - for that you can read Robert Brenner's piece in New Left
Review 123) but it's obviously insufficient. What we have in classical
economic terms is the specter of deflation: a Covid depression for the vast
majority, an unparalleled boom for the new oligarchy. The question that's
emerging from the present situation, under the longer shadow of climate
change, is what kind of political control, or at least steering, is
exercised over "the economy" - which is not an abstract collection of
statistics, but instead the substance, direction and results of people's
activity in society. I think you have put it extremely well:

The neoliberal frame privileges flows of money and goods. A different order
> promotes flows of human experiential know-how and the ability of people to
> aggregate a sense of what they can concretely do for themselves and
> others.
>

That's exactly it. Neoliberalism is over. Every society on earth needs to
have a very explicit debate and struggle over the shape of this "different
order." After all, Trump won his first election on the rhetoric of national
production and protectionism. The concrete sense of this protectionist move
- the question it was asking and answering - is what people can do to
reinforce a racist/extractivist social order. The center left's problem has
been not admitting the existence of any threat whatsoever, claiming that
the only threat is the insanity of the other party. But the truth is that
the unfettered market order of what we used to call "globalization" (and I
guess most people remember that I am "anti-globalization") has brought the
world of 7+ billion people to the edge of social and ecological breakdown,
leading first to the kind of civil unrest that we now have in the US, and
threatening to culminate in authoritarianism and war. The issues of
protection, and indeed, of security (but of what kind? for whom and from
what?) are on the table, when they are not flooding the house, or burning
it down, or riddling it with bullets. So let's keep talking about the Green
New Deal - not as a "done deal" or a set of environmental homilies, but as
the emergent and urgent space in which people are called upon to reorder
their relations to each other and to nature. If this space is not rapidly
filled with concrete endeavors stretching from mutual aid all the way up to
national and international rebuilding programs, well, we're cooked. That's
all there is to it.

I have more to say about the technical issues, and I am sure you do too,
Vincent. I just wanted to reinforce your main point in this post.

all the best, Brian


>
>
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to