>
> Zak McGregor wrote:
>
> Then the cycle will never end. For people outside the USA, Biden poses
> probably an even greater risk to their lives than Trump. The US left needs
> to realise that they a. can't effect meaningful change through the ballot,
> and b. need to bring the entire system down from within.
>

 On the face of it, this seems absurd, and others have already said why.
Yet two things strike me.

First, having lived outside the United States for a long time, the hardest
thing that confronted me on returning was the normalization of US corporate
imperialism and the cult of the military. At every public appearance of a
soldier who spent years butchering people overseas, you're supposed to
respect their suffering and emphasize with their PTSD, instead of publicly
asking how the endless wars can be ended, who are the criminals who
organize those wars, and why so many soldiers sign up voluntarily for one,
two, three tours of "duty," which itself is a sickening misnomer for the
betrayal of humanity. Sure, I well understand that many people left behind
by the capitalist economy are lured into the military, and I respect and
support the ones who admit their mistake and denounce their abusers. But
not the others, not those who form the recruiting pool for the militias and
the Trumpistas. The majority of USians fail to look outside their country,
to find solidarity with the victims of its brutality, and they were shocked
and amazed that someone would want to blow up the World Trade Towers! Huh?
Why exactly should the US have the right to rain infinite bombs on the
Middle East or anywhere else around the world, and never receive any
violent answer? Even many of my friends here still seem to think Obama was
a noble man and a force for good in the world! Huh? The guy who supported
the Arab dictators, prolonged the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, cozied up to
the surveillance capitalists and used their manipulation techniques, and
supported the fracking industry to the point where the US became the
largest exporter of fossil fuels under his watch? If you have the slightest
political discipline, and not the fuzzy emotional attachments that are
exalted here in the name of populism, then these things become obvious. Of
course such ignorance is not shared by everyone, there is definitely not
one America as Frederic Neyrat says, but the normalization of imperialism
is a lot worse than pitiful, it's abject and criminal in itself, and that's
what Zak's talkin' about imho.

Second, as already stated I am definitely going to vote Biden/Harris and I
encourage everyone who can to do so, in order to open up a viable space in
which to fight for real change in this country and in the world - a fight
that will require activism and mass demonstrations in addition to everyday
commitment, organization, institution-building and the development of a
left worthy of the name. Yet it's interesting to see what has led to this
moment. All the grassroots pressure that elected a Black man to the
presidency in 2008, that created and supported the Black Lives Matter
movement, that worked in favor of immigrant rights, and that pushed the
environmental state into open conflict with extractivist industry, all that
led to the backlash called Trump - by far the weakest and most incompetent
president the US has had since it rose to hegemony after WWII. Thanks to a
terrible circumstance -- which, from this one angle and this one only, is a
blessing in disguise -- Covid-19 struck and revealed exactly how
incompetent and stupid Trump is, breaking his power (at least, if you get
out to vote, folks) and even more importantly, revealing the inner rot of
this country, with its racist police, its militias, its savage industrial
corporations, its fascist Silicon Valley tycoons, etc etc etc. In this
sense the system has definitely been undermined from within, although it
took the pandemic to precipitate the breakdown.

Now we are finally in a good position in this country. Our abusive
dominance of world politics has been shattered by Trump's arrogance. Our
systemic racism is officially recognized as an historical fact that must be
changed. The pathology of our militarism has been exposed by the gun-toting
Proud Boys and Three Percenters. Our economy is durably damaged (notably
the fossil fuel sector, the airlines sector, the agricultural export sector
- in other words, some of those whose CO2 emissions are murdering planet
earth). No armed revolution could have achieved this, it would have been
nipped in the bud by the FBI, just as they rightly stopped the bomb-happy
militia in Michigan. Instead it has been done by a combination of tireless
ecological, multiracial and socialist critique, and by the sheer force of
unconscious internal contradictions. Now, don't get me wrong, I do not wish
for the country's entire economic or even military system to disintegrate,
because out of those ruins some new fascist monster would inevitably arise.
Let's think strategically instead of emotionally or narcissistically. The
collapse of the European constitutional monarchies in 1914 was not a force
for good in the world, and a conflagration similar to those of 1914-1945
could easily happen today. In fact, everything points to its increasing
likelihood. The apocalyptic wish that is now supported by so many
anarchists is another example of fantasmatic self-gratification
masquerading as politics. Instead of apocalypse we have the great good
fortune of severe and devastating decline, which makes it possible to
change our national priorities. If we work hard to entirely disqualify, not
just the rabid Republican right, but also the cynical status quo ante of
the Clintonian Democrats, and if we create the new solidarities, new laws
and new institutions that will be required to face the current national
emergency (which is both social and climatological), then maybe we can
recover some dignity by collectively doing less harm to ourselves and the
rest of the world. The phase of undermining has been successful, everyone
on the left can be proud of that. But actually building something better is
a lot more difficult and it requires a very different approach.

So in the end, I agree with Zak a lot more than I thought at first, but
still not entirely. You ought to post more often, Zak.

Solidarity, Brian
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to