No need to answer inane provocations, shallow insults, sterile
ejaculations, like this sentence.
Ignore them, or best to offer constructive comments as you most often
do, those which lead to productive exchanges. Like this sentence.
At 03:22 PM 1/15/2021, you wrote:
For what reason do you wish to evaluate China? Do they need to
fulfill some doctrinaire and idealist definition of communism such
that we don't denounce them and deny their accomplishments?
The CPC has many millions of well-informed members. What does our
ill-informed opinion matter?
And further, what does this evaluation of China have to do with a
thread about dialogical internationalism and a strategy for the left
in our countries?
This seems like a derailment of the thread, more likely to trigger
white rage and yellow peril concern trolling, then help imagine a
viable left strategy.
On 2021-01-15 21:02, Joseph Rabie wrote:
A question for Dmytri:
Is China a truly Communist country, and if so, what are the markers of this?
--
Dmytri Kleiner
@dmytri
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
