I haven’t followed the latest surge in NFTs as much as I’d like, but I wrote this, among other things, on cryptokitties, NFTs and art as a derivative https://circaartmagazine.net/a-celestial-cyberdimension-art-tokens-and-the-artwork-as-derivative/
I’m interested in why now though, beyond growing the speculation in crypto. the past five years has seen a huge rise in art as an asset class and art is seen as a good hedge against market volatility. Tokens create situations where these art investments have greater liquidity. But I'm interested in why everyday users are interested in NFTs. Is it pure desperation and precarity - you're in debt, you probably won't own a house so why not make a bet and invest in a token that might win big. Finn Brunton and I were talking about this last week for an upcoming issue of Neural. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:18 PM patrice riemens <[email protected]> wrote: > Aloha, > > Let me say that First Dog on the Moon has, not for te first time, the > definitive, if not answer, then at last commentary on the issue: > > > https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/mar/12/cryptoart-what-is-it-and-can-you-eat-it > > Enjoy! > have a nice day and don't become fungible! > p+7D! > > ps: ALL FDotMoon cartoons (& merchandise too! ;-) on the website: > > https://firstdogonthemoon.com.au/ > > (It's Australian, oeuf corse ...) > > Op 11-03-2021 18:19 schreef Brian Holmes <[email protected]>: > > > I can't answer the second question, but as to the first I believe that > there are three distinct forms of money that currently operate in a > hierarchy: > > -- Infinite money which is produced and deregulated in the financial > markets through the manipulation of information > > -- Institutional money which is produced and regulated within national > frames by governments seeking to stabilize social reproduction > > -- Sweat money which is produced on the ground through the exploitation of > labor paid at the bear minimum of survivability > > The last form of money is the most extensive one, it's the most common > coin, the basis of most livelihoods on earth. Institutional money, however, > has been carefully decoupled from sweat money; and infinite money has been > decoupled from institutional money in its turn. Institutional money began > to be produced through Keynesian management of national economies from the > 30s onward, it's inseparable from social democracy. Infinite money started > up after the postwar gold standard was abandoned in 1971, and became what > it is today with the introduction of computerized trading. > > What does infinite money mean to its owners? Financial capital is power > when it is applied to institutions or labor processes. However it can also > be used for status displays, what Veblen called "conspicuous consumption." > So you have to bring art back in. For better and mostly worse, "high" > culture remains the noisy ghost at the top of the capitalist pyramid. > > best, Brian > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:47 AM Felix Stalder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm sure many have followed the NFT art saga over the last couple of > months and seen today's headline that somebody just paid $ 69,346,250 > for a NFT on a blockchain, meta-data to claim ownership of the > "originalcopy" of a digital art work. > > https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/first-open-beeple/beeple-b-1981-1/112924 > > I don't want to start a discussion on the revolutionary vs reactionary > character of this emerging art market. All of that has already been > said. If you want a close approximation of my perspective, I refer you > to this: > > > https://everestpipkin.medium.com/but-the-environmental-issues-with-cryptoart-1128ef72e6a3 > > What I'm more interested in here is to ask two things. > > What -- after a decade of quantitative easing and crypto-currencies > rising into the stratosphere -- monetary value is indicating for the > segment that profited the most from these developments and what does > that mean for the rest of us? > > And, assuming that this is not a cartoon version of a potlatch where > wasting resources serves to put rivals to shame, how many different > scams -- money laundering would be an obvious contender -- are being > layered on top of one other to create this? > > Quite puzzled. Felix > > > > > > > > > > -- > | |||||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com | > | Open PGP | http://felix.openflows.com/pgp.txt | > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: -- http://www.rachelodwyer.com/ +353 (85) 7023779
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected] # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
