[email protected] (Niels Möller) writes: >> According to Eli's page and the AES submission paper, there is Serpent-0 >> and Serpent-1 and the paper discuss (page 22-23) that the key schedule >> has changed. > > Do you think nettle's implementation is serpent-0, or is it just > broken?
I don't know, I suspect it is serpent-0 but haven't confirmed it. >> I updated the wikipedia article on this: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpent_%28cipher%29 > > Hmm, I can't find any mention of serpent-0 there? I see it, maybe there is some caching? > If you have a half-done port of libgrypt's serpent code, maybe you or I > could finish it? Sure! I suspect everything except the key schedule is working in my port. Should I try to make it compatible with libgcrypt, and presumably Serpent-1? Thus modifying serpent-test.c? I'll send a patch later. /Simon _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
