[email protected] (Niels Möller) writes: > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > >> Would this mean that nettle is now compatible with the libgcrypt version >> of serpent? > > That's the idea. > >> In that case would the LGPL libgcrypt code be used instead? > > Simon said he was working on that. I don't know current status, so I > figured it was good to fix the old Nettle code too (it turned out to be > easy).
I'll resume my work -- I recall that I got it to a stage where it built and generated ciphertext, however it didn't match the test vectors that were in Nettle back then. Hopefully it will match now, and I can submit the patch shortly. /Simon _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
