Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > ripemd and ripemd-128 are considered broken. I don't know if ripemd-x, > x>=256 have been used anywhere. Having the SHA-3 winner instead would be > a much better choice.
Thanks. The related naming question is: Should the header file be nettle/ripend160.h (declaring the single algorithm ripemd160) or nettle/ripemd.h (declaring all supported hash functions in the family)? Current include file naming is not 100% consistent, with sha.h, md4.h and md5.h, and luckily it doesn't have to. Question is, what makes the most sense for ripemd? Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
