On 08/27/2011 11:24 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos<[email protected]> writes:
ripemd and ripemd-128 are considered broken. I don't know if ripemd-x,
x>=256 have been used anywhere. Having the SHA-3 winner instead would be
a much better choice.
Thanks. The related naming question is: Should the header file be
nettle/ripend160.h (declaring the single algorithm ripemd160) or
nettle/ripemd.h (declaring all supported hash functions in the family)?
I'd use ripemd160.h to avoid confusion with the broken ripemd.
regards,
Nikos
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
