Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbarysh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > +const struct ecc_curve *nettle_get_gc256b(void)
>> > +{
>> > + return &_nettle_gc256b;
>> > +}
>>
>> Would it make sense to add "gost" to this name, in similar position as
>> "secp" in other curves?
>
> I don't think so. Consider the names from "TLS Supported Groups" registry.
I still think it would be appropriate with some more context for the
Nettle name, just "gc256b" is a bit too terse and obscure. Try doing a
web search for it. Some alternatives:
nettle_get_gost_gc256b
nettle_get_gost_curve_256b
nettle_get_tls_gc256b
I can merge the support as is, but it would be good to agree on name
before release (and perhaps before adapting the gnutls code, to avoid
another renaming hassle there).
Regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
